@Paul — no. "#" is the top in the webpage. "#some thing" can be another Element of the web page, but # on your own is the very best.
That is what I called "a thing that's already been described". Now, I must determine an extremely authentic camera that's 'D700 Nikon' which includes distinct lens, batteries, and many others. So I get my normal definition and create a new definition by adding more details certain into the 'D700 Nikon' digicam. Therefore the concern is: what am I doing with the base definition?
@bonomo: Then in that scenario I might say you were being growing on it, or probably that you simply were being developing it or enlarging it.
MegMeg 24911 silver badge44 bronze badges Include a comment
I have not ever read "Here may be the potatoes." but I've read/listened to sentences like "Here's the potatoes." and "Here would be the potatoes."
How to deal with exclusion from authorship right after sizeable contribution to your collaborative exploration task?
user70227user70227 one 1 Remember to take into consideration adding a pertinent dictionary definition of expound (citing and, if possible, linking on the supply) towards your reply, that will help readers see why your recommendation may be on level.
Stack Exchange community consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the most important, most dependable on the net Local community for builders to discover, share their information, and Develop their Professions. Take a look at Stack Exchange
Stack Exchange community is made up of 183 Q&A communities like Stack Overflow, the largest, most dependable on line Neighborhood for builders to discover, share their understanding, and Develop their Occupations. Pay a visit to Stack Exchange
How to deal with exclusion from authorship right after sizeable contribution to some collaborative research task?
"information of some thing" utilised in this manner mainly indicates the same as "information about anything", but I would stay away from employing "information of some thing" for The key reason why that it may be misunderstood to mean "Information belonging to anything".
2 @StuartF If here in Where do we go from here? were for being a noun, we must 1st work out regardless of whether It truly is a typical noun or a suitable scènes topless françaises noun. As it's not capitalized, it needs to be a common noun. Now, it can't have a determiner, so it ought to be a non-depend noun.
Indeed, non-grammarians do frequent ELU, but They are really absolutely capable of Discovering about these things; to state normally could be to insult their intelligence.
And in reality, it seems like Schütze, one of many critics of your "grammatical virus" explanation for plural arrangement in expletives, agrees with Sobin that singular settlement with plural nouns is grammatical (Schütze just thinks that plural agreement can be